This year may be the year that lives in infamy. From COVID to the most tumultuous Presidential Election that I've ever lived through, some of you may not even WANT to vote! But early voting begins tomorrow (Monday, October 26) in Charles County and you may want to take a look at our survey results before you head to the polls.

As an affiliate of MDRTL, a 501(c)3, we are allowed to engage in education and legislative actions related to our mission. We cannot endorse candidates as we are not a Political Action Committee (PAC). Therefore, we are exercising our right to educate the electorate on what the candidates running in Charles County have self-reported concerning their views on abortion, euthanasia/PAS, and other related issues to protecting life.

We did not poll the presidential candidates. If you would like guidance from National Right to Life, you may find it  at this link.

Only the Republican candidates for Circuit Court Judge and MD Congressional District 5 responded to our surveys. Their answers, along with the original questions, are listed below. It is most often true that when a candidate does not answer our survey, it is because they do not agree with the mission of our organization.

​Please SHARE our link on Social Media and with your personal contacts so that they are able to make informed choices at the Polls this week and next!

Dear Friend of Life,

The Maryland Senate Judiciary Committee will be hearing an important bill THIS Wednesday. SB664, a thinly veiled and so-called "Right to Privacy" amendment would most assuredly enshrine the right to an abortion into the Maryland State Constitution without most constituents even knowing about it.

"But CCRTL, it doesn't look like an abortion amendment to me."

It is! Let me be very brief because this email will have a lot of vital information in it and I don't want to lose you. Firstly, the legality of abortion was decided on a made up constitutional "right to privacy" in Roe vs. Wade. Secondly, in the 1980s, the state of Florida passed a "privacy amendment" by referendum into their state constitution and it was used to strike down pro-life laws.  The General Assembly promised a legislatively referred amendment this year on a woman's right to abortion and here it is.  

What we need from you:

• Email every member of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee and urge an "unfavorable report" on SB664. Use the following formula:
  • Introduce yourself and where you are from.
  • Urge the Senator to oppose SB664 on the grounds that it will enshrine the right to an abortion on demand at any gestation into the MD State Constitution and that you oppose this measure.
  • Make it personal - if you have a personal story that relates to abortion, pregnancy, miscarriage, or the unintended consequences of granting a blanket "right to privacy" - include it in the reasons you oppose.
  • Go to the extremes of the bill - if a woman has a right to privacy concerning pregnancy then there is nothing that would stop 8th and 9th month abortions in our state. We would become a destination for late term abortions; hardly the kind of tourism we want to attract.
  • Thank them for hearing your concerns
  • Sign with name and city of residence.
    
    
• Emails: will.smith@senate.state.md.us; jeff.waldstreicher@senate.state.md.us; jill.carter@senate.state.md.us; Bob.Cassilly@senate.state.md.us; shelly.hettleman@senate.state.md.us; michael.hough@senate.state.md.us; susan.lee@senate.state.md.us; justin.ready@senate.state.md.us; charles.sydnor@senate.state.md.us; chris.west@senate.state.md.us; ronald.young@senate.state.md.us 
• If that is too much work for you, please just take a few moments to fill out the action alert at Maryland Right to Life's page: https://www.mdrtl.org/takeaction.html 
  
  

After that, please consider submitting either written or oral testimony for this bill to Maryland Right to Life, who is taking the lead on this fight. Please email your testimony to Julie (julie@mdrtl.org) NO LATER THAN tomorrow (Tuesday, March 10) at noon. Testimony should include:

• Written Testimony Requirements - please type at the top of testimony.
  • Bill SB664
    Name
    Organization
    Position - Opposed
  • Include your reasons for opposing the bill in a typed response.
• Oral Testimony - Email Julie if you would be willing to give your testimony orally. The hearing is THIS Wednesday, March 11, at noon. You would have to be present and able to stay for the entire hearing.
  ​
  

As always, thank you for your PROMPT action on this alert as you can see it is very time-sensitive.  Also, as email programs are filtering emails that come from distribution programs like Flocknote, please forward this email to 50 Maryland Friends. Ask them to send it to another 50. This is the grassroots; this is how we work.

For LIFE,

Ali Rak
CCRTL, President

Those were the words I blurted out last night to our former President of Charles County Right to Life, Sid Marcus. With the schedule of my own life bearing down on me on a daily basis, I never know when I will find time to do anything for the innocent babies who die every day. I have felt like there is a huge giant in our midst and I have been tempted to just let it go and do its thing. If people want to destroy themselves and continue to allow abortions and have them, let them, right? I will just focus on my own family because I feel like that’s all I can handle anyway.

Today is a Day of Prayer for the Legal Protection of Pre-born Children. Today is the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Today, 47 years ago, our country decided it would put innocent human life on the altar of sacrifice. How can I let the abortion giants scare me away from defending that life? How can I back down from this battle? How can I turn the other cheek and let others live their lives the way they want? I can’t do that for the same reason I speak out against any other infraction on the right of a human being to life.
​
                In the readings for today, David isn’t asked to fight for his people. He offers. 

Let not any man’s heart be dismayed in him: I thy servant will go and will fight against the Philistine.
~Samuel 17:32
​

Brothers and sisters, we are in a battle. The abortion giants are doing everything in their power to make sure abortion is enshrined in the Maryland Constitution. Don’t shrink away from the fight. Come to the battle with us. Arm yourselves with knowledge and the strength of God. I hope you will pick up your five stones as David did and rely on the Lord for help in defeating this Goliath. Without Him, we can do nothing. 
​

Won't you join us in a novena prayer? It began yesterday, but you can join us for the remaining eight days. You can still say yesterday's prayer! You can click here to sign up for reminders, or go straight to the prayer for day one. Don't forget to get to the prayer for today! 

This Friday, January 24, hundreds of thousands of people from around the world will peacefully assemble and march for the right to life of the pre-born child. Spots are still available on local buses:
Sacred Heart, La Plata
St. Joseph, Pomfret

Save the date for Monday, February 24 as we gather in Annapolis for food, fellowship, and rally for the rights of the pre-born child! 

I received a distressed and disturbing call last night from Heather Sells, outgoing CEO for our beloved Catherine Foundation.  Heather informed me that for the second year in a row, the Charles County Charitable Trust denied their application for a nonprofit grant.

If you don't know, due to the needs of the nonprofit community in Charles County, government-funded grants have always been available to qualified (read: IRS registered 501(c)3 organizations) nonprofits.  In 2016, the Charles County Charitable Trust was established to help determine who was deserving of these grant funds.

As an important piece of history, Catherine Foundation applied for and was denied a grant back in 2013, before the Trust was established.  From the Trust's website, they exist "[through] a formal agreement with the Charles County government, [to] manage the Nonprofit Grant Awards Program with a strong commitment to fairness, balance, and transparency. We annually distribute grant funds to qualified nonprofits that provide important services to Charles County residents." (emphasis mine)  So, this is now the third time that Catherine Foundation, a very well-established and non-controversial organization in our Charles County community, has been denied access to available funds to carry out parts of their mission.

One can imagine that a weak grant application could result in a denial letter, but Catherine Foundation employed a professional grant writer this year to request a sizeable $30,000 to help women access prenatal care within their center to ensure healthy pregnancies, help educate soon-to-be moms on how to take care of themselves and their babies (a completely necessary service in the modern era), and to help train their board-certified nurse. Susan Petroff, the Program Director for the Trust, informed Heather that the grant was denied because "Our board has a problem with using tax-payer money to fund pro-life services".

Here we have a HUGE problem, folks.  #1 is that the Charitable Trust exists to help qualified non-profits who can demonstrate that they would have an impact on the quality of lives for underserved populations or residents at large like through the arts.  They do not exist to determine if a nonprofit's mission is too political for their Board. #2 is that the grant application submitted by Catherine Foundation was not for specifically "pro-life services", it is clearly stated that their were requesting money to enhance their medical and educational services for an underserved population.  You know the maternal mortality rate in Maryland is atrocious, right?.  #3 Heather reports that the words "pro-life services" do not appear in their grant application and they do not appear on the Catherine Foundation website either.

Where did the program director get the idea that the Board has a problem with pro-life services?  Was the grant application even viewed?  According to the Trust's website, there is a strict adherence to a process, in which all applications are treated the same.  Their worthiness for a grant, again according to their website, is based on the application.  So, when were the words "pro-life" and the grant for healthy pregnancy care ever connected?  And why would the board have a problem funding the services of a pro-life organization, when they granted Catholic Charities $50,000 for the Angel's Watch shelter, which sounds not only like a "pro-life service", but the Catholic Church is the largest pro-life organization in the world.  This denial seems FAR more political than it should be for an organization that exists to support the non-profit sector.  Catherine Foundation has been a vital nonprofit organization for 35 YEARS, serving nearly 1200 clients annually at zero cost to the very people seeking their help.

We are not taking this lying down, but the reality is that the Grant funds have been awarded and the Catherine Foundation won't get another chance until the Fiscal Year 2021 cycle.  But you, like me, believe that the work of the Catherine Foundation is critical and needs to continue, with or without the County's grant.  We need to raise that $30,000, and we need to do it STAT.  I am calling on ALL of Pro-Life Maryland to step up to the plate.  That's just $100 from 300 people and Catherine Foundation gets to continue their great work without so much as a hitch.
​
Will you join Charles County Right to Life in raising this $30,000 for healthy pregnancies and families in our community?  Will you say YES to funding life-saving work and reject the establishment's political biases? If so, please go directly to the Catherine Foundation's donation page and generously give toward their mission as much as you can afford, but no donation is too little!  We have 72 hours to meet this goal and we will be updating our social media regularly with progress.  When you've made your donation, forward this message to as many friends as you can - even if they are out of state.  We have to send a message to Charles County that our leaders may not like our work, but the people of our community do and that's all that matters.

For Life,

Charles County Right to Life

My husband loves to plant a garden. Months ahead of time, he goes online and orders seeds. When they come in, the bag tells us which vegetable or fruit plant they have the potential to be. He orders squash, green beans, tomatoes, cucumbers, watermelon, and even at times, some cantaloupe. How did the manufacturer know which plant those seed would grow into? Well that’s easy: They came from the fruit or vegetable itself.
​
If any of you have studied science in school, you will know that when you cut open fruits or vegetables, most of the time you will find seeds inside. Each of those seeds has the potential to grow into the type of plant it is already destined to be. All it needs is some special ingredients like soil with the right kind of minerals in it, water, and sunshine. This is basic science.

So how do we know a human is a human? We look at the seeds. To form a human being, a seed from a human female and a seed from a human male mix together and with the right ingredients, it begins to form into a human being. The same process takes place for reproduction of an elephant, a turkey, or a dog. Two seeds from the same species forms a being of the same species.

During the process, the fetus may not always look like a human being. In fact, most children will tell you it looks like an alien. But does a green bean plant always look like a full grown green bean plant? Does that mean it’s anything other than a green bean plant? No. The same logic applies to human beings.

​This is black and white. There cannot be any exceptions. It’s a human or it isn’t. Human beings either have a right to life or not, no matter their size, level of development, brain function, location, skin color, race, or religion.

This morning I listened to Trent Horn's discussion with a pro-choice college student on his podcast. It was a pleasure to hear how two people on opposing sides could have a rational discussion on such a hot-button issue, such as abortion. I encourage you to listen to it. 

While I was listening to this on this Holy Thursday, the day we remember Jesus washing His Apostles' feet, this Scripture verse came to mind: 

"...as I have done for you, you should also do." Jesus commanded His Apostles to do as He did. Washing feet back in those days was not a job a king would do, so I'm sure it surprised His followers He was doing this. In fact, Peter didn't even want Him to do it at first. Feet are dirty and they aren't one of those body parts we like to flaunt. Typically we want to hide our feet. 

So how does this relate to abortion? 

An unplanned pregnancy is not something a woman is going to go around telling everyone about. They are going to want to hide it. Shame and fear are the biggest reason a woman would do this. In the podcast episode, the young woman explains that she received hundreds of messages from women thanking her for standing up for legal abortion in her tweet because if they were faced with an unwanted pregnancy, they would want to either hurt themselves or commit suicide. If this is true, then we have a problem.

Why would a woman resort to such a thing?

Maybe it's because we aren't washing each other's feet.

One of our members of Charles County Right to Life, Jennifer Crispell, included the following in her reflection on a day spent at the College of Southern Maryland campus where she was able to hear and speak to college students. ​

When I heard Unplanned was coming out, I thought, “Cool, another Christian movie.” No exclamation points. I thought it was going to be like every other Christian film. It wasn’t.

I went to the theater last night with my daughter and a couple of friends to watch it. I read Abby’s book and thought it would be neat to see it. I heard the creators of this project did a great job staying close to her story. They did.

I heard that people were bringing tissues in case they cried because abortion is sad and horrific and barbaric. I didn’t feel the need to bring any because I thought I had seen it all, heard it all, and experienced it all. I hadn’t.

This movie moved me in ways I can’t even express. To say the creators of this film did a great job is a complete and utter understatement. I know abortion is wrong. And I know it is evil. The way they wove Abby’s story together with the stories of others is, well, I just don’t have the words. 

After viewing this movie, I am more convinced of the need for prayer warriors to be at every Planned Parenthood and abortion facility across our country. The women entering those facilities need us. They need us to be there for them. They need us to witness to their value and dignity as a human person who needs help.

I know we can’t save them all. But the ones we can save are all worth it. Even if it is just one.
I hope you will spend the time to see this film. If you have been on the pro-life side since you can remember, if you have been pro-life since Christ came into your heart, or if you are pro-choice and wondering what all the fuss is about, you should see this movie.

Abortion advocates want to hide the truth of abortion from us. They have been very successful in doing just that. They tell us it is none of our business, that it’s a private matter between a woman and her doctor.

They.are.wrong.

What are they so afraid of?

Why don’t they want us to know what abortion really is?

Why don’t they want us to talk to these women who are entering these clinics?

What are they trying to hide?

What they are hiding is horrific. It’s messy. It’s bloody. It’s death.

The women who enter these facilities are not being taken care of. They are just another number, another statistic. And so are their babies who are discarded as waste.

This is not a gray matter. This is black and white, America. You either believe that babies are being unjustly murdered or you don’t. There can never be any justification for murder. Ever.

I hope and I pray that whoever is reading this will go see the movie if they haven’t already.
I hope and I pray that whoever is reading this who has already seen the movie, will engage in the fight.

I hope and I pray that whoever is reading this, who goes to the movie and is pro-choice, that this movie changes your heart.

For LIFE,
Karen

Dear Friend of Life,


Well, the shock has worn off, the vote tallies are official, and it's time to say a few words.


After their 4th attempt to introduce doctor-prescribed suicide in the state of Maryland, Compassion and Choices was rebuked today by the Senate which killed the bill on a second reading - an almost unprecedented action. For those who don't understand how we got here, this is a brief history of the bill in 2019.

• The End of Life Option Act was cross-filed in the House of Delegates and MD State Senate as HB399 and SB311, respectively.  District 28 Senator Arthur Ellis, a freshman from Charles County, co-sponsored SB311.
• HB399 was heard in a joint committee hearing with Health and Government Operations and Judiciary. Judiciary tallied an unfavorable report of the bill, but when combined with the anti-life bias of the HGO, the bill received a favorable report out of committee.  Our own delegate, Debra Davis of District 28 voted NO in the Judiciary Committee!
• SB311 had a tough committee hearing but the committee waited to hold a vote until they saw how HB399 played out in the House.
• After over an hour of rigorous floor debate, HB399 passed the House of Delegates 74-66.  All three District 28 Delegates voted NO on the bill.  This was in direct response to our unrelenting citizen advocacy. Your calls to our representatives were non-stop!  I received a screen shot in a totally unaffiliated homeschool Facebook group of an email from Del. Patterson that stated "Delegate Patterson does not support HB399" when the person was emailing Patterson about a completely different bill!  She was so inundated that she didn't even realize people were contacting her on other issues!
• SB311 had no action taken on it before March 15, which meant the House bill crossed over to the Senate to be considered.
• The Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee went back to the table on SB311.  They introduced dozens of amendments and ended up attaching 8 to the bill, including a mental health evaluation.  The bill advanced to the floor after an 8-3 favorable vote in committee. One of those amendments was from Senator Ellis requesting to be taken off as a co-sponsor!  This was in direct response to unrelenting citizen advocacy.  We emailed, we called, and WE WENT TO ANNAPOLIS TO SPEAK WITH HIM.
• Yesterday, for some unknown reason, Senator Zirkin requested that the second reading of SB311, during which the Senate would just vote to advance the bill with or without amendments to a third reading, be held off until this morning.  That gave us an additional 24 hours to sound the alarm and sound the alarm we did.  I received many messages from people saying that they called Senate President Mike Miller and the aid who answered was responding that she was just tallying the calls in opposition.  I got a message today from a friend who said the office was not expecting, but received, an absolute flurry of phone calls yesterday!  That was US!  I asked you to call and forward the message and you all did it and in a BIG way!  I have no doubt the last 24 hours were a gift from God to touch people's hearts in one final plea.
• Today, after another hour of passionate floor debate, the Senate Pro Temp called for a vote - a roll call vote - on the bill.  This is not a typical move.  Usually the bill would receive a favorable report just to go to a third reading at which time they would consider the amended bill as an entire delegation.  But when all the buttons were pushed, the vote count was 23-23 due to one senator abstaining.  A tie killed the bill.  Senator Arthur Ellis kept his word to vote no.

The bill is dead - for now.  It will be back next year and we will be ready.  I truly hope you all know how crucial the team effort was on defeating this dangerous legislation.  There is no one person who can claim victory - even one Senator voting the other way would have legalized physician assisted-suicide in some form.  But we were united, we were unrelenting, and we stood up to be counted.  Please, while claiming this victory and celebrating this huge win, recognize that in Maryland we can be heard.  Pro-life legislation hasn't been passed since 1993.  I think 2020 is the year we mark an end to unabashed and barely restricted abortion in this state and tell our legislators we stand for LIFE and we want our laws to reflect that.


For LIFE,
Ali Rak
CCRTL, President

It's finally here! Unplanned will be in theaters this upcoming weekend. But you don't have to wait until then to see it! There will be two private viewings this week. Go to our EVENTS page for more information. 

I also thought this would be a good time to revisit a book review Bernadette Smith wrote a couple of years ago.

And if you are interested in more information about the movie, just watch the trailer:

​So there’s this part in Scripture where this woman is seduced by a serpent to take from the very tree God forbid her and her husband to eat from. This “serpent was more subtle [sic] than any of the beasts of the earth which the Lord God had made.” (Gen 3:1)

And he caught her all by herself.

He manipulated her into thinking God was holding back because He didn’t want her to be like Him. What she didn’t realize, or maybe she forgot, was that she was created in His image and likeness. She was created to be like Him.

But that’s not what the serpent meant. The serpent wanted her to think that she should be like God in that she could control herself and the world, just as God did. Where was her husband while this was taking place? We don’t know. Genesis never specifies, but it does say that she took that apple and gave it to her husband. And he ate it.

The first sin. This is the Original Sin that cast our first parents out of Paradise. They had it made. God provided everything for them. Their work was not in vain; they were in perfect harmony with God until this dreadful fall.

​This verse this morning made me think of the debate on contraception. It was relentlessly pursued by Margaret Sanger, who wanted more than anything to make it legal for women to possess. She believed it would cure us of our oppression. In her day, she saw a lot of suffering. She saw many poor women who were so poor they could barely take care of themselves, much less the many children they had. She saw men as selfish lords, who didn’t seem to care that their wife was stuck at home all day, miserably taking care of their children. In her book, Woman and the New Race, Sanger claimed that women were begging her for birth control, that they couldn’t bear to have any more children and needed a way to avoid this in the future.

​Needless to say, she was eventually successful in her attempts to legalize birth control. In 1965, artificial means of avoiding pregnancy officially became a part of our culture. On the surface it seemed like a great victory for women. We now had a way to control our lives, to have a say, to be able to make some decisions regarding our state in life. Sanger believed children hindered a woman’s ability to participate in society in meaningful ways, so this was surely a victory for women in her mind.

But what happened when artificial birth control failed?

In 1973, a short eight years after legalized contraception, abortion became untouchable with Roe v Wade. Even Sanger had seemed to reject the horrors of abortion, claiming it was a terrible thing for a woman to have to face in her life, even calling it “violent” (loc 123) and “tribal; …common among the savages” (loc 141). She felt this stemmed from a feeling of having to decide to live in poverty, or to kill her own child. She fully believed contraception was the answer to the “horrors of abortion and infanticide.” (loc 229)

Reading these quotes, one would be led to think Sanger was opposed to such barbaric practices, but she then goes on to say that “the most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” (loc 514) She was against large families, as it was her opinion that the children were burdensome to the mother. She desperately wanted to help these mothers, to alleviate their suffering and give them freedom by helping them have more control over their fertility.

Isn’t that what we are still trying to do?

We live in a world that is constantly trying to free us from anything that would cause us to suffer. First it was contraception, now it is abortion that is touted as the answer to a woman’s prayer. It will free her from bondage to a child. She can live freely without worrying about what to do with the baby. Is this truly freeing for her? Or is this freeing for us as a society?

What is the reason women have abortions most of the time? The Guttmacher Institute says it is because women feel like they cannot handle another child; they have “financial, emotional and time concerns about their ability to care for their existing children.”

This implies perhaps they are afraid of being a burden on those around them. Women who are faced with an unwanted pregnancy know they will have to rely on others to raise the baby. They are ashamed of what has happened and how they got to where they are in the first place.

“Weren’t you careful?”

“Did he wear a condom?”

“Let’s try this contraception this time. Maybe this one will work for you.”

Or maybe, “You know your life is going to be hard. I can give you the information to our local Planned Parenthood and they can help you.”

Whose life is going to be hard? Her life will certainly be hard. But so will all those around her who love her. Her boyfriend’s/husband’s life will change. Her parents’ lives will change. Her friends’ lives will change. This baby will change the lives of every single person that mother is in contact with.

Why do those of us who are personally opposed to abortion continue to support this barbaric practice? Why would we oppose something that is so horrific, but think it’s OK for others?

I think we are afraid.

I think is us that don’t want the undue burden of walking with the person who is suffering. It is us who don’t want to help the mother take care of her baby. It is us who don’t want to watch our loved one suffer.

We are afraid our lives will change.

The serpent is still hard at work. He still wants us to think we can be like God and alleviate suffering and pain and have control over our lives. It’s a lie. It’s a big, fat lie, America. Stop plucking the apple from the tree and giving into temptation. Pick up your cross and follow Jesus.

Will you choose to help your loved one by walking with them during their trials, as Jesus does for us? Will you be His hands and feet? He is asking each of us as Christians to take up our crosses and to follow Him.